Introduction

One of the initiatives of the government of India is the Remission Of Duties And Taxes On Exported Products Policy (RoDTEP) Scheme which was enacted to bolster the international competitiveness of Indian exports. This scheme was brought into effect on the 01st of January, 2021, and was designed to substitute the Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS) which was found to violate WTO trade rules. RoDTEP seeks to mitigate the economic strain placed on exporters by reimbursing, to the extent possible, the unreimbursed indirect taxes and the unrefunded duties paid at the level of exports. This article aims to conduct a thorough legal examination of the RoDTEP scheme by analyzing its legal framework, regulatory structure, compliance with international trade obligations, legal provisions, case laws, and judicial decisions, while also focusing on its implications and prospects.

Overview and Reasons For Implementation

Indian exporters incur multiple embedded taxes and duties which do not get sufficiency reimbursed via the current mechanisms in place. These include the central and state taxes such as value-added tax (VAT) on fuel, mandi tax, electricity duties and stamp duties. The RoDTEP scheme was put in place to cover these gaps and so export costs are lowered which in turn increases competitivity at a global scale. This program is vital to implement because of India’s ambitious targets concerning international trade and the great importance of exports for the economic development of the nation.

The implementation of RoDTEP emerged because of a WTO dispute ruling against MEIS. The MEIS or market export incentive scheme is designed to increase foreign exports. In 2019, the appellate body of the WTO ruled that MEIS gave direct subsidies to exporters, breaching Articles 3.1(a) and 3.2 of the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM Agreement). 

Governing Regulations of the RoDTEP Plan

With support from the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) and functional instructions from the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC), the Ministry of Commerce and Industry has established strong regulations for the RoDTEP scheme. Like other schemes, it functions under the jurisdiction of India’s Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) which maintains the balance between the country’s trade goals and global commitments. 

Claim for the refund of taxes and duties not paid on production inputs is provided in the form of duty credit scrips. These scrips are electronically transferable and may be used to pay import duty or sell. The available remission rates are set after a thorough scrutiny of the unrelated taxes and duties claimed as being paid during the production and export process. This method of calculation seeks to ensure that benefits are apportioned equitably.

Debates continue to rage around the perceived inclusivity and fairness of the scheme for particular excluded sectors like steel and pharmaceuticals. Other covered sectors include textiles, agricultural products, leather goods, and cars. As a result of industry comments and ex-post analysis, DGFT regularly adjusts the limits and procedural rules.

Legal Basis Notifications

The RoDTEP Scheme is legally supported under Section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962 which allows the Central Government to exempt certain duties via notifications. The scope of the scheme along with its operational components is provided through multiple notifications issued by the CBIC and DGFT. These notifications explain the eligibility conditions, remission thresholds, and other implementing procedures necessary to meet the objectives of the scheme, so its implementation meets the intended purposes.

The scheme incorporates support from other provisions in the FTP outlining the trade policy of India. The integration of RoDTEP into the FTP indicates the government’s willingness to promote exports while still complying with trade policy obligations. This blend of country-specific legislation and international law is an important feature of the scheme’s regulatory framework.

Compliance with WTO Rules

One of the most important features of the RoDTEP Scheme is its linkage with the WTO rules, especially the SCM Agreement. This permits member countries to refund or remit indirect taxes on exported goods except that the reimbursement shall not exceed the tax cost. The design of the RoDTEP scheme ensures compliance because remissions are calculated based on data, and are restricted to instances where reliable data is not available.

The change in approach has been done to answer WTO questions and enables RoDTEP to operate as a trade aid rather than a subsidy that negatively impacts trade. It fulfils practices in India while simultaneously aiding compliance with global standards. This scheme not only protects India’s benefit in international trade but also strengthens the acceptance of the country in a regulated trading environment. Unlike MEIS which gave exporters subsidies based on the value of goods scrapped, this policy focuses on the removal of indirect taxes and other charges. 

Judicial precedents and case laws

These documents reveal some aspects of legal identity and some operational issues of the scheme when put into practice under judicial scrutiny. These cases highlight the factual issues and complexities of the scheme. 

In the case of M/S Reliance Industries Ltd. v. Union of India, the petitioner argued that the Government’s policy in the RoDTEP scheme which excluded some products was contrary to equality provision under Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The government policy may be challenged only if there is clear evidence of arbitrariness and discrimination. Such policy is beyond the realms of law because of the very nature of the scheme and therefore there is judicial restraint on economic and trade policy.

In Export Promotion Council v. Ministry of Commerce, the delay in remission rates for certain sectors was contested. The court pointed out the need for a scheme to be executed on time noting that delays defeat its purpose and create ambiguity for exporters. This case focused on the aspect of lapses in the administration of defined policies. 

In M/S XYZ Exporters v. DGFT, the denial of relief was challenged by exporters on the grounds of procedural non-compliance. The court reinforced the denial saying that payment benefits are dependent on compliance with rules set beforehand. This case stressed the need for stricter compliance measures to provide the benefits under the scheme and also served as a notice for exporters to follow procedural instructions.

Obstacles and Critiques of RoDTEP Scheme

Although the RoDTEP scheme is a landmark policy in boosting India’s export competitiveness, it poses some challenges as well. One notable criticism is regarding the omission of certain high-value sectors like steel and pharmaceuticals, which form a critical part of India’s exports. These sectors’ exclusion raises questions regarding the scheme’s coverage and whether it is responsive to every exporter’s needs.

The administrative burden associated with the scheme is another problem. Benefits claimed by exporters had to be supported by innumerable documents, which resulted in procedural delays and higher costs for compliance. The difficulty of the claim procedure has also discouraged small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which usually do not have adequate resources to handle red tape.

The concern around distorting issues phenomena is also fuelled by the lack of uniformity in remission rates across sectors. Some sectors faced insufficient remission rates that did not meet, let alone exceed, their tax liabilities, which defeats the purpose of the scheme. Furthermore, the lack of adequate grievance redressal procedures has rendered many exporters unprotected in case of disputes or delays.

Way Forward: Strengthening the RoDTEP Scheme

To overcome the above challenges while also improving the scheme’s efficiency, one or more of the following measures may be considered. There is also a need to widen the scope of the scheme to cover more sectors so that its objectives can be fully realised and the issues of selective benefits are resolved. Improving the empirical foundation for the determination of remission rates would improve clarity and ensure that these benefits are given in a fair manner.

Reducing the degree of documentation and the steps involved in claiming relief would lessen the compliance burden on exporters and enhance participation. Making use of certain technologies for the automation of some manual administrative functions would increase effectiveness and reduce time wastage. Conducting more training and awareness programmes among exporters, especially those belonging to SMEs, would ensure more participants can take advantage of the scheme while boosting their knowledge and compliance.

The government could look into the possibility of establishing an effective grievance redressal mechanism for conflict problems and promise resolution of issues within set time frames. Periodic reviews and discussions with various members of the industry would foster and capture known problems as well as new emerging issues so that the scheme continues to operate efficiently and effectively within the highly mobile trade environment.

The RoDTEP scheme has a compelling scope within the Indian economy, as it aims to boost exports and achieve sustainable economic growth, thereby acting as an essential driving force for change. The scheme improves the global competitiveness of Indian exporters by addressing gaps within the reimbursement of duties and taxes. India’s trade policy is better off with the scheme, as its design aims to meet international trade requirements while boosting the domestic economy, which is the need of the hour.

Though the scheme has its own set of challenges, India as a nation can reap the benefits through a favourable export environment. Working on the operational challenges, broadening the scope, and fortifying the regulatory structure can result in positive outcomes through the RoDTEP scheme. With the changing judicial precedents and regulatory changes smoothing its rough edges, the invisibility of the scheme outcomes on India’s global trade effectiveness is large, confirming its importance as the pillar of the nation’s export-boosting policies.

The post Legal Analysis of the Remission of Duties and Taxes on Exported Products (RoDTEP) Scheme appeared first on Bhatt & Joshi Associates.

Introduction

Exports are critical to a country’s economic prosperity. The bigger the exports, the greater the inward foreign remittances, the more jobs and employment, the lower the current account deficit, and hence the greater the total economic growth. As a result, in order to grow swiftly, India must improve its export performance. India is still considered a developing nation. China exports about eight times as much as India. Despite being one of the world’s largest countries, India is ranked 18th among the world’s top exporting countries in 2019. Even a small country like Singapore is ahead of India in terms of economic development. The high cost of export items is one of the primary factors behind India’s low export performance. Indian exporters are unable to sell their goods at a lower and more competitive price, rendering them uncompetitive in the global market and resulting in order cancellation.

In order to support the exporters and promote export there are various schemes that are introduced by the government such as Special Economic Zones (SEZs), Export-oriented Units (EOUs), Software Technology Parks (STPs), Electronics Hardware Technology Parks (EHTPs), Biotechnology Parks (BTPs), Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS) etc.

Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS)

The Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS) was created to encourage the manufacture and export of specified goods and products from India. Exports of notified goods/products to notified markets indicated in Appendix 3B of the Handbook of Procedures are issued freely transferable duty credit scrips based on the realized FOB value of the exports in free foreign exchange at a fixed rate under this system. These duty credit scrips can be used to pay basic customs duties on inputs or commodities imported. However, this scheme has been discontinued now and has been replaced by Rebate of Duties & Taxes on Export Products (RoDTEP Scheme).

Rebate of Duties & Taxes on Export Products (RoDTEP)

The new RoDTEP Scheme will replace the old MEIS Scheme in a phased manner from December 2020. The old MEIS scheme was not WTO-compliant, hence the new plan was required. It was against the International Trade rules. The RoDTEP scheme intends to reimburse all hidden taxes and levies that were previously unreimbursed under any export incentive scheme, for e.g. Central & state taxes on the fuel, Mandi tax levied by APMCs, Toll tax & stamp duty etc. The application process will be similar to that of the MEIS Scheme, however there will be certain adjustments in the rate of incentives. The new RoDTEP Scheme’s list of eligible products and benefit rate are currently being established.

Export-oriented units (EOU)

The EOU Scheme was established in 1980 and is regulated by Chapter 6 of the Foreign Trade Policy. The jurisdictional Development Commissioner oversees the establishment of units and their performance under the Foreign Trade Policy regulations. The scheme’s goal was to increase exports by adding more production capacity. Units that agree to export their whole production of commodities are permitted to form an EOU under this arrangement. Manufacturing, services, software development, trading, repairing, remaking, reconditioning, re-engineering, including the manufacture of gold/silver/platinum jewellery and articles thereof, agriculture, including agro-processing, aquaculture, animal husbandry, biotechnology, floriculture, horticulture, pisci-culture, viticulture, poultry, sericulture, and granites are among the industries in which these units may be involved.

EOUs can export all products in ITC (HS) without paying duty, with the exception of restricted commodities. Permits required for importation under other legislation, on the other hand, will be applicable. Before an EOU may begin commercial production, it must invest a minimum of Rs. 10 million in plant and machinery. Other than proposals for building up units in the services sector (excluding R&D, software and IT-enabled services, or any other service activity as may be authorised by the BOA), applications for setting up units under the EOU programme are approved or denied, by the committee.

EOU units are exempt from paying central excise duty on goods manufactured in India and bought through DTA, as well as from paying customs duty on capital goods, raw materials, consumables, and parts imported from other countries. These units are also eligible for a refund of the CST they paid on their purchases. Supplies to EOUs from the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) are regarded presumed exports, and Indian suppliers might benefit from them. Furthermore, foreign investment of up to 100% is permitted, subject to sectoral regulations.

Electronics Hardware Technology Parks (EHTPs)

Chapter 6 of the Foreign Trade Policy covers the Electronics Hardware Technology Parks (EHTPs) Scheme. The Ministry of Communications and Information Technology is in charge of the EHTP Scheme. An EHTP can be established by the Central Government, a State Government, a public or private sector business, or any combination of these entities under the EHTP Scheme. EHTP units can be set up in authorized EHTP complexes or anywhere else where EOUs can be set up. This type of unit is a duty-free custom-bonded region that is eligible for a CST return on purchases.

EHTP units are authorised to import any sort of commodities (excluding forbidden goods, such as capital goods, raw materials, consumables, office equipment, and so on) for the purpose of manufacturing and exporting export products without paying duty. Software can be exported via a data communication channel or via physical conveyance. The period for realisation and repatriation of export proceeds for EHTP units is nine months from the date of shipment. Four Foreign investments of up to 100% are also permitted, subject to sectoral regulations.

Software Technology Park (STP)

Chapter 6 of the Foreign Trade Policy covers the Software Technology Parks (STP) Scheme. The STP Scheme is a 100 percent export-oriented programme for developing and exporting computer software and services via data communication networks or physical media, as well as professional services. The single-point contact service to the STP units is the main draw.

In 1991, the Ministry of Communications and Information Technology established the Software Technology Park of India (STPI) to implement the STP programme. STPI is an autonomous organisation in India that manages and regulates IT parks and STPs. STPI’s principal goal is to turn India into an IT behemoth and one of the world’s leading generators and exporters of IT and software in the next several years. Approvals for STP schemes are granted through a single-window clearance system.

An STP unit can be built up in authorised STP complexes or elsewhere that EOUs can be set up. This type of unit is a duty-free custom bonded area that is eligible for a CST refund on purchases. STP units are permitted to import all types of items (excluding restricted goods, such as capital goods, raw materials, consumables, office equipment, and so on) for the purpose of manufacturing and exporting export products without paying tariffs. Software can be exported via a data communication channel or via physical conveyance. For the STP units, the period of realisation and repatriation of export proceeds shall be nine months from the date of export.

Special Economic Zones (SEZs)

The Special Economic Zone (SEZ) Act was adopted in 2005 by the Department of Commerce, Ministry of Commerce & Industry, Government of India, with the goal of establishing an internationally competitive and hassle-free environment for exports. For the purposes of trade operations, duties, and tariffs, a SEZ is described as a “particularly demarcated duty-free enclave that shall be assumed to be foreign territory (out of Customs authority).” The SEZ Act of 2005, which was accompanied by SEZ Rules, went into effect on February 10, 2006.

It offers significant procedure simplification and a single-window clearance mechanism for situations involving the federal and state administrations. The programme is designed for larger businesses and will have a substantial impact on future exports and employment. The SEZ strategy strives to develop competitive, convenient, and integrated zones that provide world-class infrastructure, utilities, and services to global firms. The SEZ Act of 2005 envisions state governments playing a vital role in export promotion and infrastructure development. Some of the features of SEZ are-

1. Duty free import/domestic procurement of goods for development, operation and maintenance of SEZ units.
2. Exemption from Central Sales Tax, Exemption from Service Tax and Exemption from State sales tax. These have now subsumed into GST and supplies to SEZs are zero rated under IGST Act, 2017.
3. Other levies as imposed by the respective State Governments.
4. Single window clearance for Central and State level approvals.
5. This scheme has a significant impact on future exports & employment. About 230 IT-ITeS specific SEZs have been notified by the DOC.

Biotechnology Park (BTP)

BTP is also mentioned under Chapter 6 of Foreign Trade Policy. All products, with the exception of prohibited exports under ITC (HS), are duty-free for BTP units. All types of products, including capital goods, as specified in the Foreign Trade Policy that are required by the unit for its activities or in connection with them may be imported duty-free, provided they are not restricted imports under the ITC (HS). BTP units are eligible for a refund of CST paid on purchases and are free from paying Central Excise Duty on items acquired from DTA that are manufactured in India. For BTP units, the period of realisation and repatriation of export proceeds shall be nine months from the date of export.

The basic objectives are-

1. To boost up the biotechnology sector all over the country by setting up biotechnology parks.
2. To strengthen the existing infrastructure facilities to make Indian Biotech industry a global leader.
3. To create high-quality infrastructure with the necessary support for undertaking Research and Development.
4.  To foster innovation and entrepreneurship.

Written by- Harshvardhan Singh Sikarwar

The post Special Schemes for Promotion of Export in India appeared first on Bhatt & Joshi Associates.