Introduction

The year 2025 has marked a significant period of legislative transformation in India, characterized by unprecedented constitutional developments and sweeping regulatory reforms across multiple sectors. The most notable event was the vice president jagdeep dhankhar’s resignation on July 21, 2025, which created ripple effects across India’s constitutional framework. Simultaneously, the country witnessed substantial legislative changes in labor laws, environmental regulations, and technology governance that will reshape India’s legal landscape for years to come.

This legislative roundup examines the constitutional implications of the vice president jagdeep dhankhar’s resignation, analyzes the implementation of new labor codes, reviews environmental law updates, and explores emerging technology regulations. These developments represent a paradigm shift in how India approaches governance, worker protection, environmental stewardship, and digital transformation.

Constitutional Framework: Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar’s Historic Resignation

Constitutional Provisions Governing Resignation

Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar’s resignation on July 21, 2025, invoked Article 67(a) of the Indian Constitution, which states that “the Vice-President may, by writing under his hand addressed to the President, resign his office” [1]. This constitutional provision provides the mechanism through which the second-highest constitutional office in India can be vacated voluntarily. The resignation took effect immediately upon submission to President Droupadi Murmu, demonstrating the constitutional principle of immediate transfer of authority in high offices.

The constitutional framework surrounding the Vice President’s office is established under Part V of the Constitution, specifically Articles 63 to 71. Article 63 establishes that “there shall be a Vice-President of India,” while Article 64 designates the Vice President as the ex-officio Chairman of the Rajya Sabha. The resignation under Article 67(a) represents only the third instance in India’s constitutional history where a Vice President has resigned mid-term, following V.V. Giri in 1969 and Mohammad Hidayatullah in 1979.

Legal Implications and Precedential Value

Vice president jagdeep dhankhar’s resignation citing health concerns establishes an important precedent regarding the voluntary relinquishment of high constitutional offices. The constitutional principle underlying such resignations rests on the doctrine of public service and the recognition that effective discharge of constitutional duties requires physical and mental capability. This precedent reinforces the constitutional value that public office is held in trust for the people, and occupants must prioritize public interest over personal ambition.

The immediate effect of the resignation triggered the constitutional mechanism under Article 67(b), which provides for succession arrangements. The Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha assumes the functions of the Chairman until a new Vice President is elected. The Election Commission of India, acting under the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961, and the Presidential and Vice-Presidential Elections Act, 1952, announced elections for September 9, 2025 [2].

Electoral Process and Constitutional Requirements

The election of a new Vice President follows the procedure outlined in Article 66 of the Constitution, which mandates election by an electoral college consisting of members of both Houses of Parliament. The election process is governed by the system of proportional representation by means of the single transferable vote, ensuring broader representation across party lines. This electoral mechanism reflects the constitutional design of creating consensus-based leadership for the second-highest office in the country.

Labor Law Transformation: Implementation of New Labor Codes

The Four Pillars of Labor Reform

India’s labor law landscape underwent revolutionary changes with the implementation of four new labor codes that replaced 29 existing central labor laws [3]. These codes represent the most ambitious labor law reform since independence, addressing wages, social security, occupational safety and health, and industrial relations. The Wage Code, 2019; the Industrial Relations Code, 2020; the Code on Social Security, 2020; and the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020 collectively establish a new paradigm for worker protection and employer obligations.

The Code on Wages, 2019, universalizes the concept of minimum wage across all sectors and establishes a statutory floor wage below which no minimum wage can be fixed. Section 6 of the Code mandates that “the Central Government shall fix a floor wage taking into account the living standard of workers” [4]. This provision ensures that minimum wage fixation considers regional economic conditions while maintaining national standards for worker welfare.

Minimum Wage Restructuring and Implementation

The new wage structure under the updated codes establishes differentiated minimum wages based on skill levels. Unskilled workers are entitled to a daily minimum wage of ₹783, semi-skilled workers receive ₹868, and highly skilled workers earn ₹1,035 per day [5]. This skill-based differentiation represents a departure from the previous uniform approach and acknowledges the economic value of different skill sets in the modern economy.

The implementation mechanism involves state governments fixing minimum wages within their jurisdictions while adhering to the central floor wage. Section 9 of the Code on Wages requires that “the appropriate government shall review and revise the minimum rates of wages at intervals not exceeding five years.” This provision ensures regular adjustment of wages to reflect economic changes and inflation patterns, protecting workers from erosion of purchasing power.

Social Security Expansion and Coverage

The Code on Social Security, 2020, extends social security coverage to previously excluded categories of workers, including gig workers, platform workers, and fixed-term employees. Section 2(60) defines “organised worker” broadly to include “an employee in the organised sector and includes a fixed term employee” [6]. This expansion addresses the changing nature of employment relationships in the digital economy and provides security to millions of previously unprotected workers.

The Code establishes various social security schemes including the Employees’ Provident Fund, Employees’ State Insurance, Employees’ Compensation, Employment Injury Benefit Scheme, and Maternity Benefits. Chapter VII of the Code specifically addresses “Social Security for Gig Workers and Platform Workers,” recognizing the emergence of new employment categories in the digital economy.

Environmental Law Updates and Regulatory Framework

Climate Change Mitigation and Legal Framework

India’s environmental law framework has evolved significantly to address climate change challenges and international commitments under the Paris Agreement. The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, continues to serve as the primary legislative framework for environmental protection, but recent amendments and notifications have strengthened implementation mechanisms and expanded regulatory scope [7].

The National Green Tribunal (NGT), established under the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, has played a crucial role in environmental jurisprudence. Section 14 of the NGT Act provides that “the Tribunal shall have the jurisdiction over all civil cases where a substantial question relating to environment (including air and water pollution) is involved” [8]. Recent judgments by the NGT have established important precedents regarding environmental clearances, pollution control, and restoration obligations.

Forest Conservation and Biodiversity Protection

The Forest Conservation Act, 1980, underwent significant amendments to strengthen forest protection mechanisms while facilitating legitimate developmental activities. Section 2 of the Act prohibits “de-reservation of forests or use of forest land for non-forest purpose” except with central government approval. Recent notifications have streamlined the forest clearance process while maintaining stringent environmental safeguards.

The Biological Diversity Act, 2002, governs access to biological resources and associated traditional knowledge. Section 3 of the Act regulates “access to biological diversity by foreign individuals, institutions or companies” and requires prior approval from the National Biodiversity Authority. Recent amendments have strengthened penalty provisions and expanded the scope of regulated activities to address biopiracy concerns.

Pollution Control and Regulatory Enforcement

The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, and the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, form the backbone of India’s pollution control framework. These Acts establish State Pollution Control Boards and the Central Pollution Control Board with powers to regulate industrial emissions and effluents. Section 25 of the Water Act requires “no person shall, without the previous consent of the State Board, establish or take any steps to establish any industry, operation or process which is likely to discharge sewage or trade effluent” [9].

Recent amendments have strengthened penalty provisions and introduced environmental compensation mechanisms. The concept of “polluter pays” has been reinforced through judicial interpretation and regulatory guidance, making polluting industries liable for restoration costs and environmental damage.

Technology Law and Digital Governance Framework

Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023

The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, represents India’s primary data protection legislation, establishing rights for data principals and obligations for data fiduciaries. Section 5 of the Act provides that “personal data shall be processed lawfully, fairly and transparently” [10]. The Act introduces concepts of data localization, cross-border data transfer restrictions, and significant penalties for non-compliance.

The Act establishes the Data Protection Board of India with powers to investigate violations, impose penalties, and issue binding directions. Section 18 empowers the Board to “inquire into any complaint made to it or, on its own motion, inquire into any breach of the provisions of this Act.” This enforcement mechanism provides teeth to data protection laws and ensures meaningful compliance by digital platforms and service providers.

Information Technology Act Amendments

The Information Technology Act, 2000, continues to govern cyberspace regulation, but recent amendments have expanded its scope to address emerging digital challenges. Section 43A of the IT Act mandates that “where a body corporate, possessing, dealing or handling any sensitive personal data or information in a computer resource which it owns, controls or operates, is negligent in implementing and maintaining reasonable security practices and procedures” resulting in wrongful loss, such body corporate shall be liable to pay damages [11].

Recent Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, have imposed additional obligations on social media intermediaries and digital news publishers. These rules require intermediaries to establish grievance redressal mechanisms, trace message origins when legally required, and comply with government takedown orders within specified timeframes.

Industrial Relations and Collective Bargaining

Modernized Dispute Resolution Mechanisms

The Industrial Relations Code, 2020, modernizes India’s industrial relations framework by consolidating three existing laws and introducing contemporary dispute resolution mechanisms. Section 55 of the Code establishes “Industrial Relations Committees” at establishment level to “promote measures for securing and preserving amity and good relations between the employer and workmen” [12].

The Code introduces the concept of “negotiating unions” and “negotiating councils” to formalize collective bargaining processes. Chapter V of the Code specifically deals with “Recognition of Trade Unions and Negotiating Union or Negotiating Council,” providing a structured approach to worker representation and collective negotiations.

Strike and Lockout Provisions

The Code maintains restrictions on strikes and lockouts while providing clearer procedures for legal industrial action. Section 61 prohibits strikes and lockouts in “public utility services” during the pendency of proceedings before any labour court, tribunal, or arbitrator. This provision balances the fundamental right to collective bargaining with the need to maintain essential services.

The definition of “public utility service” under Section 2(53) includes railways, air transport services, postal, telegraph and telephone services, and generation, production and supply of electricity. This expanded definition recognizes the critical nature of infrastructure services in the modern economy while preserving worker rights within defined parameters.

Occupational Safety and Health Standards

Enhanced Safety Framework

The Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020, establishes modern safety standards applicable to all sectors of the economy. Section 25 mandates that “every employer shall ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the safety, health and welfare at work of all workers while they are at work” [13]. This provision establishes the fundamental employer obligation for workplace safety across all industries and employment categories.

The Code introduces risk-based enforcement and self-certification mechanisms for low-risk industries while maintaining strict oversight for high-risk sectors. Chapter III specifically addresses “Safety and Health,” requiring employers to conduct risk assessments, implement safety management systems, and provide safety training to workers.

Working Conditions and Welfare Provisions

The Code modernizes working time regulations and introduces flexibility in work arrangements while protecting worker welfare. Section 54 limits working hours to “not more than eight hours in a day and forty-eight hours in a week” while allowing flexible scheduling arrangements subject to worker consent and safety considerations.

Welfare provisions under Chapter V include requirements for drinking water, washing facilities, first aid, canteens, and rest rooms. These provisions ensure basic amenities for workers while allowing employers flexibility in implementation based on establishment size and nature of operations.

Regulatory Compliance and Enforcement Mechanisms

Unified Compliance Framework

The new labor codes introduce a unified compliance and enforcement framework designed to reduce regulatory burden while strengthening worker protection. The concept of “Inspector-cum-Facilitator” under Section 51 of the Industrial Relations Code transforms the traditional enforcement approach from punitive to facilitative, encouraging compliance through guidance rather than merely penalizing violations.

Digital platforms for registration, returns, and compliance management streamline administrative processes and reduce bureaucratic delays. The introduction of composite registration and unified returns reduces paperwork and compliance costs for employers while maintaining regulatory oversight.

Penalty Structure and Enforcement

Enhanced penalty provisions across all codes ensure deterrent effect against violations while providing proportionate sanctions. The Industrial Relations Code prescribes imprisonment up to one year or fine up to ₹1 lakh or both for violations of strike and lockout provisions. This graduated penalty structure balances the need for compliance with the principle of proportionality in punishment.

Conclusion

The legislative developments of 2025, marked by Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar’s resignation and the implementation of new labor codes, represent a watershed moment in India’s legal evolution. These changes reflect the country’s commitment to constitutional governance, worker protection, environmental stewardship, and digital transformation. The constitutional precedent established by the Vice Presidential resignation reinforces democratic values and the principle that public office is held in trust for the people.

The new labor codes promise to modernize India’s industrial relations framework while protecting worker rights and promoting economic growth. Environmental law updates demonstrate India’s commitment to sustainable development and climate change mitigation. Technology regulations address the challenges of digital transformation while protecting citizen privacy and data security.

These legislative changes require careful implementation and continuous monitoring to achieve their intended objectives. The success of these reforms will depend on effective enforcement mechanisms, stakeholder cooperation, and adaptive governance approaches that respond to emerging challenges while maintaining the rule of law and constitutional values.

References

[1] Constitution of India, Article 67(a). Available at: https://legislative.gov.in/constitution-of-india 

[2] Election Commission of India. (2025). Notification for Vice President Election. 

[3] Ministry of Labour & Employment. (2025). Labour Law Reforms. Government of India. Available at: https://labour.gov.in/labour-law-reforms 

[4] The Code on Wages, 2019, Section 6. 

[5] Sankhla & Co. (2025). India’s New Labour Laws 2025: Updates & Implementation Plan. Available at: https://sankhlaco.com/indias-labour-codes-set-to-be-implemented-in-stages-starting-in-2025-important-developments/ 

[6] The Code on Social Security, 2020, Section 2(60). 

[7] Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. 

[8] National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, Section 14. 

[9] Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, Section 25.

Authorized and Published by Dhrutika Barad

The post Legislative Roundup: Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar’s Resignation and Key Labor, Environment, and Technology Law Updates appeared first on Bhatt & Joshi Associates.

Introduction 

India’s labor laws have undergone significant changes in recent years, marking a profound shift in the country’s approach to regulating labor markets. With the introduction of four comprehensive labor codes – the Code on Wages, the Industrial Relations Code, the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, and the Social Security Code – the government has embarked on an ambitious journey to consolidate and simplify over 40 central laws. These reforms aim to create a more streamlined, transparent, and efficient regulatory framework for labor relations. This article explores the legal perspectives on India’s labor law reforms, their implications for workers’ rights, and the broader socio-economic context in which these changes have unfolded.

Historical Context of Labor Laws in India

Labor laws in India have their genesis in the colonial era, a period marked by the need to regulate industrial relations in the wake of rapid industrialization. The earliest labor legislations were sector-specific and aimed at addressing immediate concerns of worker exploitation and industrial unrest. The Factories Act of 1881 was one of the first attempts to regulate working conditions, followed by other laws aimed at specific issues such as child labor, work hours, and occupational health.

Post-independence, India adopted a comprehensive approach to labor legislation, enacting statutes like the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947, the Minimum Wages Act of 1948, and the Factories Act of 1948. These laws sought to strike a balance between protecting workers’ rights and fostering industrial growth. Over time, however, the labor law framework became increasingly fragmented, leading to inefficiencies, compliance challenges, and overlapping regulations. Calls for reform grew louder, particularly as India’s economy shifted from an agrarian base to a more industrial and service-oriented structure.

Objectives and Framework of India’s New Labor Law Reforms

The introduction of the four labor codes marks a watershed moment in the evolution of India’s labor laws. The reforms aim to achieve several key objectives, including the simplification of compliance procedures, promotion of ease of doing business, strengthening of social security nets, and alignment with the changing nature of work. By consolidating multiple statutes into four unified codes, the government seeks to address long-standing issues of redundancy, complexity, and regulatory overlap.

The Code on Wages focuses on ensuring uniformity in wage-related matters across sectors. It consolidates laws such as the Payment of Wages Act, the Minimum Wages Act, the Payment of Bonus Act, and the Equal Remuneration Act. The Industrial Relations Code modernizes the framework for industrial disputes and collective bargaining by replacing the Industrial Disputes Act, the Trade Unions Act, and the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act. The Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code integrates provisions from multiple laws governing workplace safety, welfare, and employee well-being. Finally, the Social Security Code unifies the regulatory framework for social security benefits, encompassing laws like the Employees’ Provident Fund Act and the Employees’ State Insurance Act.

Key Provisions of the New Labor Codes and Their Implications

Minimum Wages and Wage Security

A cornerstone of the India’s labor law reforms is the emphasis on wage security and uniformity. The Code on Wages introduces a uniform definition of wages, which addresses ambiguities and inconsistencies in earlier statutes. A significant provision of the code is the establishment of a national floor wage, aimed at ensuring a minimum income level for workers across states. This measure is intended to reduce wage disparities and protect workers in economically weaker regions from exploitation. However, debates persist regarding the adequacy of the floor wage, its alignment with the cost of living, and the mechanisms for its enforcement.

The code also incorporates provisions to ensure timely payment of wages, a longstanding issue in several industries, particularly in the informal sector. By prescribing penalties for delayed payments and empowering labor inspectors to monitor compliance, the code seeks to enhance wage security. Yet, challenges remain, particularly in sectors with weak regulatory oversight or a high prevalence of informal employment.

Industrial Disputes and Job Security

The Industrial Relations Code introduces significant changes to the regulation of industrial disputes, employment contracts, and collective bargaining. One of the most debated provisions is the increase in the threshold for establishments requiring government approval for layoffs, retrenchment, or closure. Under the new code, this threshold has been raised from 100 to 300 workers. While proponents argue that this change provides greater flexibility to employers and encourages industrial growth, critics contend that it undermines job security and exposes workers to increased risks of unemployment.

The code also seeks to modernize the framework for collective bargaining by simplifying the process for trade union registration and recognizing the concept of a “negotiating union” or a “negotiating council” in establishments with multiple unions. This measure is intended to streamline negotiations and reduce industrial disputes. However, the introduction of fixed-term employment contracts and restrictions on strikes without prior notice have been criticized as measures that dilute workers’ rights and limit their ability to protest against unfair practices.

Workplace Safety and Health

The Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code represents a significant step forward in addressing workplace safety and employee welfare. It mandates comprehensive risk assessments, regular safety audits, and the provision of welfare facilities such as clean drinking water, canteens, and first-aid facilities. The code’s emphasis on extending its coverage to include gig workers and platform workers is particularly noteworthy, reflecting an acknowledgment of the changing nature of work in the digital economy.

Despite these advancements, questions remain about the practical implementation of these provisions. The code’s reliance on self-certification by employers and the limited capacity of labor inspection agencies have raised concerns about accountability and enforcement. Moreover, informal sectors, which employ a significant portion of India’s workforce, remain difficult to regulate effectively under the new framework.

Social Security for All

The Social Security Code seeks to expand the coverage of social security benefits to previously excluded categories of workers, including those in the unorganized sector, gig workers, and platform workers. It envisions a universal social security fund, to be financed through contributions from employers, employees, and the government. Key benefits under the code include maternity leave, gratuity, and provident fund contributions, which are aimed at providing a safety net for workers in vulnerable sectors.

However, the code’s reliance on state governments and employers for implementation has raised concerns about the uniformity and consistency of coverage. Critics argue that the absence of clear guidelines on funding and benefit distribution could create disparities and hinder the effectiveness of these provisions. Additionally, the integration of gig and platform workers into the social security framework poses unique challenges, given the fluid and often informal nature of their work arrangements.

Regulatory and Judicial Framework

The labor codes envision a robust regulatory framework, with provisions for inspections, penalties, and dispute resolution mechanisms. The shift towards digital compliance and self-certification is aimed at reducing bureaucratic hurdles and promoting transparency. However, the success of these mechanisms depends on the capacity of enforcement agencies, the effectiveness of grievance redressal systems, and the willingness of stakeholders to adhere to the new norms.

India’s judiciary has played a pivotal role in interpreting labor laws and safeguarding workers’ rights. Landmark judgments have shaped the evolution of labor jurisprudence, providing insights into the principles underlying labor relations. Cases such as Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India (1984), Workmen of Dimakuchi Tea Estate v. Management (1958), and State of Punjab v. Jagjit Singh (2016) underscore the judiciary’s commitment to upholding workers’ rights and ensuring procedural fairness.

Case Law Analysis

In Bandhua Mukti Morcha, the Supreme Court emphasized the constitutional mandate to protect workers’ rights, particularly in the context of bonded labor. The court’s interpretation of Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty) as encompassing the right to live with dignity has had far-reaching implications for labor jurisprudence.

Similarly, the judgment in State of Punjab v. Jagjit Singh reinforced the principle of “equal pay for equal work,” highlighting the need to eliminate wage disparities based on contractual status or other discriminatory practices. These cases, among others, reflect the judiciary’s role as a guardian of workers’ rights in the face of evolving labor market dynamics.

Criticisms and Challenges of India’s Labor Law Reforms

While the labor law reforms aim to address longstanding issues and align India’s labor market with global best practices, they have faced significant criticism. One of the primary concerns is the perceived prioritization of employer interests over workers’ rights. Provisions such as the increased threshold for layoffs, restrictions on strikes, and the introduction of fixed-term employment contracts are seen as measures that weaken the bargaining power of workers and erode job security.

Additionally, the reliance on self-certification and digital compliance has raised questions about the effectiveness of enforcement mechanisms. In sectors with a high prevalence of informal employment, ensuring compliance with the new codes remains a daunting challenge. Critics also argue that the reforms do not adequately address the unique needs of vulnerable groups, such as women, migrant workers, and those employed in hazardous industries.

Conclusion and Recommendations 

India’s labor law reforms represent a significant step towards modernizing the regulatory framework and addressing the challenges of a dynamic labor market. While the new labor codes offer several benefits, including simplified compliance procedures, expanded social security coverage, and improved workplace safety standards, their success hinges on effective implementation and enforcement.

To achieve their intended objectives, it is essential to strengthen institutional capacities, enhance the accountability of employers, and promote social dialogue among stakeholders. Policymakers must ensure that the reforms strike a balance between fostering economic growth and protecting workers’ rights. A collaborative approach that prioritizes inclusivity, fairness, and transparency is crucial for building a sustainable and equitable labor market in India. By addressing the gaps and challenges in the new framework, India can pave the way for a future where economic progress is underpinned by social justice and worker empowerment.

Download Booklet on Labour Laws in India – Worker Rights, Wages & Compliance

Download Booklet on Trade Union Laws in India – Workers’ Rights & Labor Movements

The post Legal Perspectives on India’s Labor Law Reforms and Their Impact on Workers’ Rights appeared first on Bhatt & Joshi Associates.