Supreme Court
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized balance, biases, credibility, Criminal Trial, defense, evidentiary integrity, fairness, impartiality, inconsistencies, investigative procedures, investigative standards, Judicial Scrutiny, JUSTICE, legal context, legal precedent, Legal Principles, Periyasamy v. State, Prosecution, Rule of Law, scrutiny, Supreme Court, Verdict, witness testimony
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized 1937, adjudication, Allahabad High Court, Article 15, Constitution Bench, constitutional issues, constitutional principles, Constitutional Rights, discrimination, equality, Indian Constitution, Legal Framework, Legal Intervention., legal precedent, legal reform, legal system, Muslim Personal (Shariat) Application Act, Muslim Personal Law, personal laws, PIL, polygamy, religious beliefs, religious communities, religious freedoms, religious pluralism, religious practices, Section 494 IPC, secularism, Supreme Court, Supreme Court's role, uniform civil code, validity
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized 'change in law' compensation, 2020 judgment, abuse of legal process, Adani Power, Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, argument, compensatory tariff, dismissal, Dr. A.M. Singhvi, JVVNL, Late Payment Surcharge, legal recourse, Miscellaneous Application, plea, procedural irregularities, Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission, Rs. 1376.35 crores, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized Accountability, civil society advocacy, democracy, Disclosure, donor privacy, Electoral Bonds, financial institutions, grassroots mobilization, legislative reforms, media scrutiny, political financing, regulatory frameworks, Supreme Court, Transparency
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized accused, Background, Case Analysis, cheque dishonor cases., complainant's prima facie case, complainants, Context, courts, decision-making, discretion, discretionary, fairness, financial distress, Integrity, interim compensation, Interpretation, Judicial Scrutiny, JUSTICE, Legal Proceedings, legal system, mandatory, Negotiable Instruments Act, observation, parameters, presumption, principles, procedural flaws, purpose, relationship, ruling, Section 143A, significance, Supreme Court
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized Accountability, Accountability Measures, Bharatiya Janata Party, BJP, Corporate Donors, democratic governance, democratic process, donations, ECI, Election Commission of India, Electoral Bonds, electoral ecosystem, fairness, India, individual donors, Integrity, Judicial Intervention, Political Funding, political parties, public perception, reform, regulatory oversight, regulatory reforms, Supreme Court, Transparency, transparency measures
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized bauxite mining, community consultations, development policies, Dongria Kondh tribe, economic development, environmental degradation, environmental governance, environmental impact assessments, forest clearance, Forest Conservation Act, Forest Rights Act, Gram Sabhas, inclusive development practices, indigenous rights, Landmark Judgment, Legal Framework, Legal Landscape, Ministry Of Environment & Forest & Ors., Niyamgiri Hills, Orissa Mining Corporation Ltd, Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act (PESA), participatory governance, protecting indigenous lands, social injustice, Supreme Court, Sustainable Development
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized 21st century, balanced future, bauxite mining, conservation efforts, Constitutional Mandate, development interests, economic significance, environmental jurisprudence, environmental law, environmental standards, FCA, forest clearance, Forest Conservation Act, Forest Rights Act, FRA, inclusivity, indigenous rights, irreversible environmental impact, Legal analysis, legal arguments, legal decisions, legal frameworks, Legal Precedents, Ministry Of Environment & Forest & Ors., MOEF, Niyamgiri Hills, Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, PESA, petitioner, respondent, responsible development, rissa Mining Corporation Ltd, Supreme Court, Sustainable Development, tribal rights
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized bauxite mining, conservation principles, constitutional validity, Dongria Kondh, ecological integrity, environmental conservation, environmental ethics, environmental governance, FCA, Forest Conservation Act, Forest Rights Act, FRA, indigenous communities, industrial development, Landmark Judgment, Legal Framework, Legal Implications, Legal Precedents, Ministry Of Environment & Forest & Ors., Niyamgiri Hills, Odisha, Orissa Mining Corporation Ltd, Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, PESA, Supreme Court, traditional way of life, tribal rights
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized 1954, 2006, Appellate Review, Article 20(1), Constitutional Interpretation, Constitutional Safeguard, Criminal Laws, Factual Matrix, Food Safety and Standards Act, Judicial Insight, Labeling Violation, Legal Adaptability, legal precedent, Lesser Punishment, Misbranding, New Laws, Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, Retrospective Legislation, Rule Violation, Sentencing Conversion, Supreme Court, T. Barai v. Henry Ah Hoe
